🔗 Share this article

The nation's controversial policy to restrict social platforms access for individuals under sixteen is sparking debate internationally. Officials, campaigners, and guardians are watching with great interest to see if this approach will set a precedent for the rest of the world.

The European Momentum

Across Europe, a increasing number of countries are exploring comparable measures.

• Denmark has announced a restriction on social media for youth below 15, with the PM declaring that mobile devices and apps are "taking away our youngsters' youth". A law could be formalized in the coming year.
• Norway is planning to enforce a age restriction of 15, pointing to the need to protect young people from the "influence of the algorithms".
• Ireland is introducing a online verification tool to confirm the age and identity of social media users. Authorities have stated that an Australian-model ban is "an tools in reserve".
• In The Spanish government, the leader has urged lawmakers to pass a proposal raising the minimum age for using social media to 16.
• In France, the head of state has threatened a ban for under-15s, and a legislative committee has recommended a comparable step, potentially involving an overnight "screen time restriction" for older teenagers.
• The authorities in the Netherlands has advised parents to prevent their kids from social media until 15.

For the broader EU, the European parliament has approved a advisory resolution demanding a ban for teenagers under 16 except if a parent decides otherwise is given. Although it warns of the "compulsive" design of these platforms, the step does not establish enforceable legislation.

"An effective age restriction is a good starting point," stated a leading MEP supporting the measure.

The UK: An Evidence-Based Stance

Across Britain, the leadership has remained open to a future ban, emphasizing that "no measure is off the table" but stressing any policy must be "based on robust research".

Earlier, support grew behind a legislative effort to introduce restrictions on social media use by teenagers, but it was in the end watered down. However, the administration vowed to further research the topic.

Advocacy groups have expressed apprehensions. One foundation established by the family of a teenager who was lost after viewing dangerous online content argues that a blanket age ban might not improve online safety and could result in a "dangerous transition" of exposure when users turn 16.

"This ban is a response to the inability of the social media companies to design products and services that are secure and suitable for minors," stated a leading online safety campaigner.

America: A Decentralized Approach

Stateside, legislation is mostly unfolding at the state level amid country-wide gridlock.

• Utah demands adult approval for minors to use social media and restricts overnight use.
• Florida has enacted a measure barring children under fourteen from joining social media, though it is subject to court battles.
• The state of Virginia has approved a law limiting minors to 60 minutes of social media access per day, with extra use needing a guardian's okay.
• The state of Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have also enacted measures requiring parental consent for teenagers to create social media accounts.

Despite widespread concern and proposals from some politicians to copy Australia's lead, a nationwide ban is presently seen as a distant prospect.

Global Perspectives

Beyond these regions, further nations are likewise exploring options.

• The Malaysian government aims to prohibit social media for under-16s beginning next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has raised the required age for one major platform to 16.

However, global organizations take a more measured tone. Unicef has advised that age-based restrictions have downsides and "might prove counterproductive". The organization points out that online platforms can be a "critical link" for vulnerable youth and that government action should not be a "excuse" for platform operators to prioritize safety.

While this worldwide conversation evolves, the actions of Australia and others demonstrate that governments internationally are increasingly content to stand by for tech companies to make changes on their own.